AlmaLinux
The Enterprise Replacement
- RHEL Compatible
- Stable and Reliable
- Free and Open Source
- Enterprise-grade Support
- Less Cutting-edge
- Limited Desktop Environments
Best for
Enterprise stability
AlmaLinux vs Manjaro
AlmaLinux and Manjaro are two popular Linux distributions with distinct purposes. This page evaluates their features, pros, and cons to help you choose the right one for your needs. Whether you prioritize stability or cutting-edge features, you'll find insights here.
Manjaro
User-Friendly Arch
- Easy-to-use Arch-based
- Rolling Release Model
- Wide Desktop Selection
- Great Hardware Support
- Frequent Updates
- Potential Stability Issues
Best for
Desktop enthusiasts
TL;DR: Pick AlmaLinux for enterprise stability. Pick Manjaro for a user-friendly, rolling-release desktop experience.
Side-by-side comparison
How they stack up across key categories.
Ease of use
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux offers a straightforward setup that is familiar to enterprise users accustomed to RHEL-based systems.
Manjaro
Manjaro provides a user-friendly installation process and a customizable interface, making it appealing to both new and experienced Linux users.
Desktop feel
AlmaLinux
Focused on server environments, AlmaLinux doesn't prioritize desktop aesthetics but offers a clean, functional experience.
Manjaro
Manjaro provides a polished desktop experience with multiple environment choices, catering to diverse user preferences.
Stability
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux is designed for stability, with rigorous testing and long-term support for enterprise-grade reliability.
Manjaro
Manjaro's rolling release model means it can be less stable than point-release distros, but it generally maintains a good balance.
Updates
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux follows RHEL's update cycle, providing regular security patches and updates without frequent major changes.
Manjaro
Manjaro has a continuous update model, delivering the latest software quickly, though this can require more frequent maintenance.
Software access
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux offers robust enterprise software through the EPEL repository, focusing on stability over the latest versions.
Manjaro
Manjaro provides access to a vast array of software via the Arch User Repository (AUR), offering cutting-edge applications.
Privacy
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux adheres to open-source principles, providing a secure environment with no telemetry.
Manjaro
Manjaro respects user privacy with minimal data collection, aligning with Arch's philosophy of user control.
Community & docs
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux benefits from an active community and strong documentation derived from RHEL resources.
Manjaro
Manjaro has a vibrant community and extensive documentation, supported by Arch Linux's comprehensive resources.
Gaming
AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux is not optimized for gaming but can run games that support RHEL environments.
Manjaro
Manjaro, with its up-to-date kernel and drivers, is well-suited for gaming and supports Steam and Proton.
Pros & cons summary
AlmaLinux
Pros
- AlmaLinux is a fork of CentOS, providing a 1:1 binary compatible alternative to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), making it ideal for enterprise use.
- It offers a stable and reliable environment suitable for production servers.
- As a community-driven project, AlmaLinux is free to use and open source, with no licensing fees.
- Offers long-term support and security updates, ensuring an enterprise-grade environment.
Cons
- AlmaLinux does not include the latest software packages and features, focusing instead on stability over cutting-edge technology.
- The choice of desktop environments is limited compared to more desktop-focused distributions.
Manjaro
Pros
- Manjaro provides an easy-to-use Linux experience based on Arch Linux, making it accessible for newcomers while retaining the power of Arch.
- Its rolling release model ensures that users have access to the latest software and features without needing to upgrade the entire OS.
- Users can choose from a variety of desktop environments, including XFCE, KDE Plasma, and GNOME.
- Manjaro offers excellent hardware detection and support, making it suitable for a wide range of devices.
Cons
- The rolling release model means frequent updates, which can be overwhelming for some users.
- While generally stable, the continuous integration of new software can sometimes lead to stability issues.
Which should you pick?
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Switching from Windows
Pick: Manjaro
Manjaro offers a familiar, user-friendly desktop experience that eases the transition from Windows.
Following Tutorials
Pick: Either
Both distros have strong community support and documentation, making them suitable for learning.
Older Hardware
Pick: Manjaro
Manjaro's lightweight desktop options and excellent hardware detection are ideal for older systems.
Gaming
Pick: Manjaro
Manjaro's access to the latest drivers and gaming software makes it a better choice for gamers.
Work/Professional Use
Pick: AlmaLinux
AlmaLinux's stability and enterprise support make it perfect for professional environments.
Simple Daily Desktop
Pick: Manjaro
Manjaro offers a smooth and customizable desktop experience, ideal for everyday use.
FAQ
Quick answers to common questions.
What is the relationship between AlmaLinux and Manjaro?
AlmaLinux is a RHEL-based distribution focused on enterprise use, while Manjaro is an Arch-based distribution tailored for desktop users.
Which distro is more beginner-friendly?
Manjaro is generally more beginner-friendly due to its user-friendly interface and easy installation process.
How do the distros compare in terms of performance?
Manjaro may offer better performance for desktops with its updated packages, while AlmaLinux focuses on server performance and stability.
Can I try these distros before installing?
Yes, both AlmaLinux and Manjaro offer live boot options from their installation media, allowing you to try them before installation.
How is software compatibility between the two?
AlmaLinux focuses on enterprise-grade software, while Manjaro provides access to a broader range of applications via AUR.
What about hardware support?
Manjaro excels in hardware support with its up-to-date kernel, while AlmaLinux supports certified enterprise hardware.
How do their release cycles differ?
AlmaLinux follows a stable release cycle based on RHEL, while Manjaro employs a rolling release model for continuous updates.
Is it easy to switch between these distros?
Switching involves reinstalling and configuring each system, but both distros provide tools and documentation to aid migration.
Compare another pair?
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.