AlmaLinux
The Enterprise Successor
- Enterprise-grade stability
- CentOS successor
- Strong community support
- Regular security updates
- Less cutting-edge software
- Heavier system requirements
AlmaLinux and Void Linux offer distinct advantages to different types of users. This page explores their unique features, strengths, and ideal use cases to help you decide which Linux distribution is right for you.
The Enterprise Successor
The Independent Choice
TL;DR: Pick AlmaLinux for enterprise stability. Pick Void Linux for a lightweight, customizable experience.
How they stack up across key categories.
AlmaLinux offers a familiar environment for CentOS users with extensive documentation.
Void Linux requires more manual configuration, suitable for experienced users.
AlmaLinux provides a classic, stable desktop experience with GNOME.
Void Linux allows for highly customizable desktops, often using lighter environments like XFCE.
AlmaLinux prioritizes stability, making it ideal for servers and enterprise use.
Void Linux's rolling release model can introduce occasional instability, but generally remains reliable.
AlmaLinux follows a predictable update schedule with frequent security patches.
Void Linux provides continuous updates as part of its rolling release model.
AlmaLinux supports a wide range of software typical of RHEL-based distributions.
Void Linux uses XBPS, offering a unique selection of packages and rapid updates.
AlmaLinux offers standard privacy features typical of RHEL-based systems.
Void Linux is privacy-conscious, with minimal telemetry and user tracking.
AlmaLinux benefits from a strong community and comprehensive documentation.
Void Linux has a smaller community, but active forums and a dedicated user base.
AlmaLinux can handle gaming but is not specifically optimized for it.
Void Linux, with lighter desktop environments, can be tuned for gaming efficiency.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: AlmaLinux
It offers a more familiar environment for those used to traditional desktops.
Pick: Either
Both have good documentation, but Void may require more advanced knowledge.
Pick: Void Linux
Its lightweight nature makes it ideal for older systems.
Pick: Void Linux
Its customizable and lightweight configuration can optimize performance.
Pick: AlmaLinux
Its stability and enterprise support make it suitable for professional environments.
Pick: AlmaLinux
Provides a straightforward, stable environment for everyday tasks.
Quick answers to common questions.
AlmaLinux is a fork of CentOS, created to provide a free alternative to RHEL after CentOS shifted focus to CentOS Stream.
AlmaLinux is generally more beginner-friendly due to its stable environment and extensive documentation.
Void Linux is lightweight and often faster, especially on older hardware, while AlmaLinux focuses on stability, which may impact speed.
Yes, both distros offer live environments that you can boot from a USB to try before installing.
AlmaLinux has broad compatibility with enterprise software, while Void Linux offers a unique selection of packages through its XBPS system.
AlmaLinux benefits from compatibility with hardware supported by RHEL. Void Linux supports a wide range of hardware but may require more manual setup.
AlmaLinux follows a stable release cycle similar to RHEL, while Void Linux uses a rolling release model for continuous updates.
Switching involves backing up data and reinstalling, as they have different base systems. Each offers unique features, so choose based on your needs.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.