CentOS Stream vs Parrot OS

CentOS Stream and Parrot OS offer distinct experiences tailored to different needs. This page explores their features, stability, and user focus, helping you decide which is right for you.

Centos Icon

CentOS Stream

Continuous stability

  • Rolling-release model for up-to-date features
  • Strong community support
  • Compatible with RHEL environments
  • Enterprise-grade reliability
  • Not a long-term support version
  • Less suited for cutting-edge software
Best for Server environments
Parrot Os Icon

Parrot OS

Security and privacy

  • Built-in security tools
  • Privacy-focused features
  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Supports a variety of devices
  • Not beginner-friendly
  • Less support for enterprise environments
Best for Security enthusiasts

TL;DR: Pick CentOS Stream for enterprise stability. Choose Parrot OS for security and privacy needs.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Stream

CentOS Stream is familiar to those used to Red Hat environments but may require some learning for newcomers.

OS

Parrot OS can be complex due to its security tools, which might be challenging for beginners.

Desktop feel

Stream

CentOS Stream offers a traditional GNOME desktop, focusing on a stable and consistent experience.

OS

Parrot OS uses a lightweight MATE desktop environment, which is fast and efficient.

Stability

Stream

CentOS Stream provides a stable platform by releasing updates that will appear in the next RHEL version.

OS

Parrot OS focuses on security and may include more frequent updates to ensure vulnerabilities are patched.

Updates

Stream

CentOS Stream operates on a rolling-release model, providing a constant stream of updates.

OS

Parrot OS follows a semi-rolling release, balancing stability and up-to-date software.

Software access

Stream

CentOS Stream leverages the Red Hat ecosystem, offering access to enterprise-grade software.

OS

Parrot OS includes a wide array of pre-installed security tools and supports Debian repositories.

Privacy

Stream

CentOS Stream focuses more on stability and enterprise needs than privacy.

OS

Parrot OS is designed with privacy in mind, including tools for anonymity and secure communications.

Community & docs

Stream

CentOS has a strong community with extensive documentation and support forums.

OS

Parrot OS has a dedicated community focused on security, though documentation may be less extensive.

Gaming

Stream

CentOS Stream is not typically optimized for gaming but can run games with the right configurations.

OS

Parrot OS is not focused on gaming but can support it through its Debian base.

Pros & cons summary

CentOS Stream

Pros

  • CentOS Stream acts as a rolling-release version, providing a continuous stream of updates that precede the next RHEL minor release.
  • It has a strong community backing with extensive forums and documentation.
  • Due to its upstream relationship with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, it offers compatibility with RHEL, making it a great choice for those in enterprise settings.
  • The focus on stability makes it suitable for server and production environments.

Cons

  • CentOS Stream does not offer the long-term support that traditional CentOS did, meaning it might not be suitable for those looking for very stable, long-term releases.
  • Users seeking the latest cutting-edge software might find CentOS Stream limiting as it prioritizes stability over bleeding-edge features.

Parrot OS

Pros

  • Parrot OS is tailored for security professionals with a comprehensive suite of security and penetration testing tools.
  • It emphasizes privacy features, ensuring user data is protected and anonymous.
  • The distro is lightweight, making it suitable for older hardware and systems with limited resources.
  • Parrot OS is versatile, supporting different types of devices and architectures, including ARM.

Cons

  • The focus on security tools and features may overwhelm beginners unfamiliar with Linux.
  • Parrot OS is more focused on individual users and security enthusiasts than enterprise environments, offering fewer enterprise-level support options.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: CentOS Stream

It's more familiar to users with enterprise Windows experience due to its GNOME desktop.

🔐

Following security tutorials

Pick: Parrot OS

Parrot OS is equipped with numerous security tools ideal for following penetration testing tutorials.

🖥️

Using older hardware

Pick: Parrot OS

Its lightweight design is efficient and well-suited for older systems.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Either

Both can handle gaming with configurations, though neither is optimized for it.

💼

Work/professional use

Pick: CentOS Stream

Offers enterprise-grade stability and compatibility with RHEL.

🖥️

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Either

Both can be configured for simple daily use, though CentOS Stream is more traditional.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

Are CentOS Stream and Parrot OS related?

They are not directly related; CentOS Stream is related to Red Hat, while Parrot OS is based on Debian.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

CentOS Stream is more beginner-friendly due to its focus on stability and a more traditional desktop environment.

Which offers better performance?

Parrot OS is more lightweight and may offer better performance on older hardware, while CentOS Stream excels in stability.

Can I try these distros before installing?

Yes, both distros offer live environments that allow users to try them before installing.

How is software compatibility managed?

CentOS Stream uses the RHEL package ecosystem, whereas Parrot OS uses Debian repositories, both providing extensive software options.

What about hardware support?

Both distros offer good hardware support, though Parrot OS's lightweight nature may better support older devices.

How do their release cycles differ?

CentOS Stream follows a rolling-release model, while Parrot OS has a semi-rolling release cycle.

Is it easy to switch between these distros?

Switching requires installation and configuration adjustments, but both are based on Linux, so the core experience is similar.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.