CentOS Stream
Continuous innovation
- Rolling release model
- Close ties with RHEL
- Strong community support
- Stable for development
- Not ideal for production
- Less user-friendly than desktop-oriented distros
CentOS Stream and Zorin OS are both popular Linux distributions, each serving distinct user bases. This page delves into their features, strengths, and weaknesses to help you decide which is the right choice for you.
Continuous innovation
Windows-like simplicity
TL;DR: Pick CentOS Stream for development and server environments. Pick Zorin OS for a user-friendly desktop experience.
How they stack up across key categories.
CentOS Stream is aimed at developers and advanced users, requiring more technical knowledge to navigate and operate.
Zorin OS is user-friendly and designed to be intuitive for newcomers, especially those switching from Windows.
CentOS Stream focuses on server and development environments, offering a minimal desktop experience.
Zorin OS provides a polished, Windows-like desktop interface that is visually appealing and easy to use.
CentOS Stream offers a stable environment but is less suitable for production due to its rolling release model.
Zorin OS is based on Ubuntu LTS, providing a stable and reliable desktop experience with regular updates.
CentOS Stream receives continuous updates as part of its rolling release cycle, providing early access to future RHEL features.
Zorin OS follows Ubuntu's LTS cycle, offering periodic updates and long-term support, focusing on stability over cutting-edge features.
CentOS Stream has access to a wide range of enterprise-grade software through the EPEL repository.
Zorin OS, based on Ubuntu, provides access to a vast repository of software, including Ubuntu's Snap and Flatpak support.
CentOS Stream emphasizes enterprise-grade security and privacy, suitable for development and testing environments.
Zorin OS focuses on user privacy, with minimal data collection and strong privacy settings out of the box.
CentOS Stream benefits from a vast community and extensive documentation, partly due to its connection to RHEL.
Zorin OS has a supportive community and a variety of guides and forums aimed at helping newcomers to Linux.
CentOS Stream is not optimized for gaming, with a focus on server and development use cases.
Zorin OS is more suitable for gaming, with support for Steam and other gaming platforms, leveraging Ubuntu's gaming capabilities.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: Zorin OS
Its Windows-like interface makes it ideal for former Windows users.
Pick: Either
Both have extensive documentation and community support.
Pick: Zorin OS
Offers a lightweight version specifically for older machines.
Pick: Zorin OS
Better suited for gaming with support for Steam and Proton.
Pick: CentOS Stream
Ideal for development and testing environments.
Pick: Zorin OS
User-friendly and aesthetically pleasing for everyday use.
Quick answers to common questions.
CentOS Stream and Zorin OS are different types of Linux distributions, with CentOS Stream focusing on development and Zorin OS designed for user-friendly desktops.
Zorin OS is more beginner-friendly due to its Windows-like interface and ease of use, making it ideal for newcomers.
Zorin OS might feel heavier on older hardware due to its graphical features, while CentOS Stream is more resource-efficient but requires technical knowledge to optimize.
Yes, both CentOS Stream and Zorin OS offer live versions that can be run from a USB drive for testing purposes.
Zorin OS, based on Ubuntu, supports a wide range of software including Snap and Flatpak. CentOS Stream focuses on enterprise software, accessible via the EPEL repository.
Zorin OS benefits from Ubuntu's hardware compatibility, while CentOS Stream might require additional configuration for less common hardware.
CentOS Stream uses a rolling release model, providing constant updates. Zorin OS follows Ubuntu LTS, offering longer support cycles with periodic updates.
Switching between the two involves installing the new OS, as they use different package managers and system configurations, but both provide tools to facilitate data migration.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.