EndeavourOS and MX Linux are both popular choices for Linux users, each offering unique strengths. This page explores their differences in usability, updates, and community support to help you decide which better suits your needs.
The Arch way, simplified
Stable and user-friendly
TL;DR: Pick EndeavourOS for latest software and customization. Pick MX Linux for stability and ease of use.
How they stack up across key categories.
EndeavourOS simplifies the Arch experience with an easy installer but still requires familiarity with Linux.
MX Linux is very user-friendly, offering a smooth out-of-the-box experience suitable for beginners.
EndeavourOS allows for extensive customization with multiple desktop environments available.
MX Linux primarily uses XFCE, offering a traditional and efficient desktop experience.
As a rolling release, EndeavourOS might experience occasional instability with new updates.
MX Linux is based on Debian Stable, ensuring a highly reliable and stable system.
EndeavourOS provides continuous updates, keeping software current but needing regular attention.
MX Linux follows a stable release cycle, with updates focused on security and stability.
Access to the AUR gives EndeavourOS users an extensive array of software options.
MX Linux provides a robust selection of software from Debian repositories and additional MX tools.
EndeavourOS, like Arch, respects user privacy with minimal telemetry.
MX Linux emphasizes privacy with strong default settings and minimal data collection.
EndeavourOS has a growing community with excellent documentation and support forums.
MX Linux boasts a dedicated community and comprehensive documentation, making it accessible for all users.
EndeavourOS, with its access to the latest drivers and software, is well-suited for gaming.
MX Linux can handle gaming but might require manual updates for the latest drivers and tools.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: MX Linux
MX Linux offers a more familiar and stable environment for newcomers.
Pick: EndeavourOS
EndeavourOS aligns closely with Arch, making it ideal for learning and following diverse Linux tutorials.
Pick: MX Linux
MX Linux's lightweight XFCE desktop is optimized for older systems, providing better performance.
Pick: EndeavourOS
With its access to the latest drivers and AUR, EndeavourOS is ideal for gaming enthusiasts.
Pick: MX Linux
MX Linux's stability and comprehensive toolset make it a solid choice for professional environments.
Pick: Either
Both distros provide reliable options for everyday desktop use, depending on user preference for updates.
Quick answers to common questions.
They are not directly related but share the Linux base. EndeavourOS is Arch-based, while MX Linux is based on Debian.
MX Linux is more beginner-friendly due to its stable and intuitive setup, whereas EndeavourOS requires more Linux knowledge.
Performance depends on use case; MX Linux is optimized for stability, while EndeavourOS offers cutting-edge software, which can affect speed.
Yes, both distros offer live environments that allow you to test them without installation, with MX Linux also supporting persistence.
EndeavourOS has a wider range of software through AUR, while MX Linux benefits from Debian's extensive repositories.
MX Linux generally offers better out-of-the-box hardware support, while EndeavourOS may require additional configuration for certain devices.
EndeavourOS is a rolling release with continuous updates, while MX Linux follows a stable, less frequent release cycle.
Switching involves reinstalling, as they use different package managers and base systems, but both have supportive communities to assist.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.
