EndeavourOS vs Nobara

EndeavourOS and Nobara represent two unique flavors of Linux, each tailored to different audiences. This page dives into their core features, strengths, and ideal use cases, helping you decide which distro best matches your needs.

Endeavouros Icon

EndeavourOS

The Arch Gateway

  • Arch-based simplicity
  • Minimal pre-installed software
  • Active community
  • Rolling release
  • Less beginner-friendly
  • Requires manual setup
Best for Arch enthusiasts
Nobara Icon

Nobara

Gaming Ready Linux

  • Out-of-the-box gaming support
  • Fedora-based stability
  • User-centric enhancements
  • Frequent updates
  • Less flexibility in customization
  • Heavier resource usage
Best for Gaming enthusiasts

TL;DR: Pick EndeavourOS for a minimal, Arch-based experience. Choose Nobara for gaming-ready convenience.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS offers a guided installation but requires some manual configuration post-install.

Nobara

Nobara is designed for ease of use, with pre-configured settings for gaming and a polished user experience.

Desktop feel

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS provides a choice of several desktop environments, focusing on simplicity and customization.

Nobara

Nobara provides a sleek and modern desktop experience, heavily geared towards gaming performance.

Stability

EndeavourOS

As a rolling release, EndeavourOS offers cutting-edge packages but may require more maintenance for stability.

Nobara

Nobara, based on Fedora, offers a stable release with regular updates, balancing new features with reliability.

Updates

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS uses a rolling release model, so updates are frequent and incremental.

Nobara

Nobara follows Fedora's update cycle, providing stable yet frequent updates.

Software access

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS users have access to the Arch User Repository (AUR), offering a vast range of software.

Nobara

Nobara provides access to Fedora's repositories, along with additional packages for gaming.

Privacy

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS, being Arch-based, respects user privacy with minimal telemetry.

Nobara

Nobara, based on Fedora, also respects privacy and includes open-source gaming enhancements.

Community & docs

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS has a vibrant community with extensive forums and documentation.

Nobara

Nobara benefits from Fedora's strong community support and additional resources for gaming.

Gaming

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS can be configured for gaming but requires manual setup of tools like Steam.

Nobara

Nobara is optimized for gaming out-of-the-box, with pre-installed tools and configurations.

Pros & cons summary

EndeavourOS

Pros

  • Offers a clean and minimal installation with the option to choose from multiple desktop environments.
  • Provides a rolling release model, ensuring you always have the latest software updates.
  • Has a very active and helpful community, with forums and resources for troubleshooting.
  • Great for users who want to learn more about Linux internals, as it encourages manual configuration.

Cons

  • The installation process, although guided, still requires some manual setup which can be daunting for newcomers.
  • Being a rolling release, it can sometimes lead to stability issues if updates are not managed carefully.
  • Lacks some of the out-of-the-box convenience features that other beginner-friendly distros offer.

Nobara

Pros

  • Comes with pre-installed tools and configurations optimized for gaming, like Steam and Proton.
  • Built on Fedora, providing a stable base with access to the latest software via regular updates.
  • Includes several user experience enhancements, making it more accessible for those who prefer not to tweak settings manually.
  • Offers a curated set of apps and functionalities specifically tailored for performance-oriented tasks.

Cons

  • The focus on gaming and performance can lead to higher resource usage, which may not be ideal for all systems.
  • Due to its Fedora base, it may not have as much flexibility as Arch-based distributions in terms of custom software configurations.
  • Being specialized for gaming, it might not cater well to users looking for a more general-purpose desktop environment.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Nobara

Nobara offers a more familiar gaming experience and out-of-the-box ease.

🔧

Following tutorials

Pick: EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS provides a closer experience to Arch, which is often used in tutorials.

💾

Older hardware

Pick: EndeavourOS

Its minimal installation allows users to choose lightweight desktop environments.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Nobara

Nobara is optimized for gaming with pre-configured settings and tools.

🖥️

Work/professional use

Pick: EndeavourOS

Its flexibility and access to the AUR allow for a highly customizable work environment.

🏠

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Either

Both provide a smooth daily desktop experience with different strengths.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

Are EndeavourOS and Nobara related?

No, EndeavourOS is based on Arch Linux, while Nobara is based on Fedora, each catering to different user needs.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

Nobara is more beginner-friendly due to its pre-configured settings and focus on gaming, while EndeavourOS requires more setup.

How do they compare in terms of performance?

EndeavourOS can be lighter and faster on older hardware, while Nobara might be more resource-intensive due to its gaming optimizations.

Can I try them before installing?

Yes, both EndeavourOS and Nobara offer live environments that you can boot from a USB to try before installing.

What about software compatibility?

EndeavourOS has access to the AUR, providing extensive software options, while Nobara includes gaming-focused enhancements.

How is hardware support?

Both distros offer good hardware support, but Nobara includes specific tweaks for gaming hardware and peripherals.

How often are updates released?

EndeavourOS follows a rolling release model, while Nobara follows Fedora's scheduled updates, both providing frequent updates.

Is it easy to switch between them?

Switching requires a fresh installation, as they have different bases (Arch vs Fedora) and package management systems.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.