EndeavourOS
The Arch gateway
- Easy Arch-based setup
- Active community
- Frequent updates
- Customizable installer
- Requires command line knowledge
- Rolling release can be unstable
EndeavourOS and Void Linux are two distinct Linux distributions offering unique experiences. EndeavourOS offers an approachable path to Arch Linux, while Void Linux provides a lightweight and independent system. This comparison will help you decide which distro suits your needs.
The Arch gateway
Minimalist and independent
TL;DR: Pick EndeavourOS for an Arch-based experience. Pick Void Linux for lightweight independence.
How they stack up across key categories.
EndeavourOS simplifies Arch Linux installation, making it more accessible to users familiar with Linux.
Void Linux, with its minimalist approach, requires more manual setup and configuration, appealing to seasoned users.
Offers multiple desktop environments during installation, allowing for tailored user experience.
Focused on minimalism, providing a clean and efficient desktop experience without extras.
As a rolling release, it provides the latest packages but can sometimes suffer from stability issues.
Void Linux is stable and predictable due to its independent development and careful package updates.
Frequent updates ensure the latest software but require vigilance for potential issues.
Updates are regular but less frequent, focusing on stability and security.
Access to the AUR provides a vast software library beyond official repositories.
Uses its own repositories and XBPS, which may have fewer packages than larger distros.
EndeavourOS does not collect user data and respects user privacy, following Arch's principles.
Provides strong privacy with minimal data collection, given its independent nature.
Has an active community and benefits from extensive Arch Linux documentation.
Smaller community with limited documentation, but active forums and IRC channels.
Good support for gaming thanks to access to the latest drivers and gaming software through the AUR.
Gaming is possible but may require more manual setup of drivers and packages.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: EndeavourOS
It eases the transition with a user-friendly installer and familiar desktop options.
Pick: EndeavourOS
Extensive Arch-based documentation and community support make it easier to find help.
Pick: Void Linux
Its lightweight nature and minimal resource usage are ideal for older machines.
Pick: EndeavourOS
Access to the AUR allows easy installation of gaming tools and drivers.
Pick: Void Linux
Offers stability and efficiency without unnecessary software clutter.
Pick: Either
Both offer efficient and customizable desktops suitable for daily tasks.
Quick answers to common questions.
EndeavourOS is based on Arch Linux, offering an easier setup, while Void Linux is entirely independent, with its own package manager and init system.
EndeavourOS is generally more beginner-friendly due to its guided installation process and comprehensive Arch-based resources.
Void Linux often provides better performance due to its minimalist approach and runit init system, which is lighter than systemd.
Yes, both offer live environments to test before installation. EndeavourOS provides a live ISO, and Void Linux has a live image available for download.
EndeavourOS benefits from the vast Arch User Repository, while Void Linux has a more limited selection, which can lead to occasional compatibility issues.
Both distros offer good hardware support, but EndeavourOS may have an edge due to the extensive Arch Linux kernel and driver support.
EndeavourOS follows a rolling release model, providing continuous updates, whereas Void Linux updates packages regularly but not as frequently.
Switching between them is feasible but requires backing up data and a fresh installation due to differences in package management and system configuration.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.