EndeavourOS vs Void Linux

EndeavourOS and Void Linux are two distinct Linux distributions offering unique experiences. EndeavourOS offers an approachable path to Arch Linux, while Void Linux provides a lightweight and independent system. This comparison will help you decide which distro suits your needs.

Endeavouros Icon

EndeavourOS

The Arch gateway

  • Easy Arch-based setup
  • Active community
  • Frequent updates
  • Customizable installer
  • Requires command line knowledge
  • Rolling release can be unstable
Best for Arch enthusiasts
Void Linux Icon

Void Linux

Minimalist and independent

  • Runit init system
  • Independent from major distros
  • Musl and glibc support
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Limited mainstream documentation
  • Manual configuration required
Best for Advanced users

TL;DR: Pick EndeavourOS for an Arch-based experience. Pick Void Linux for lightweight independence.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS simplifies Arch Linux installation, making it more accessible to users familiar with Linux.

Linux

Void Linux, with its minimalist approach, requires more manual setup and configuration, appealing to seasoned users.

Desktop feel

EndeavourOS

Offers multiple desktop environments during installation, allowing for tailored user experience.

Linux

Focused on minimalism, providing a clean and efficient desktop experience without extras.

Stability

EndeavourOS

As a rolling release, it provides the latest packages but can sometimes suffer from stability issues.

Linux

Void Linux is stable and predictable due to its independent development and careful package updates.

Updates

EndeavourOS

Frequent updates ensure the latest software but require vigilance for potential issues.

Linux

Updates are regular but less frequent, focusing on stability and security.

Software access

EndeavourOS

Access to the AUR provides a vast software library beyond official repositories.

Linux

Uses its own repositories and XBPS, which may have fewer packages than larger distros.

Privacy

EndeavourOS

EndeavourOS does not collect user data and respects user privacy, following Arch's principles.

Linux

Provides strong privacy with minimal data collection, given its independent nature.

Community & docs

EndeavourOS

Has an active community and benefits from extensive Arch Linux documentation.

Linux

Smaller community with limited documentation, but active forums and IRC channels.

Gaming

EndeavourOS

Good support for gaming thanks to access to the latest drivers and gaming software through the AUR.

Linux

Gaming is possible but may require more manual setup of drivers and packages.

Pros & cons summary

EndeavourOS

Pros

  • EndeavourOS simplifies the Arch Linux installation process, making it accessible for more users.
  • The community is vibrant and supportive, with active forums and helpful documentation.
  • As a rolling release, EndeavourOS offers the latest software updates and features.
  • The Calamares installer allows users to customize their desktop environment and packages during installation.
  • Offers a variety of desktop environments out-of-the-box, providing flexibility in user experience.

Cons

  • Users need to be comfortable with the command line for maintenance tasks and troubleshooting.
  • Being a rolling release, it can occasionally introduce stability issues with updates.
  • New users may find the initial setup and configuration challenging compared to more beginner-friendly distros.

Void Linux

Pros

  • Void Linux uses the runit init system, which is faster and simpler than systemd.
  • As an independent distribution, it is not based on any other major distro, offering a unique experience.
  • Supports both musl and glibc, giving users choice in their C library.
  • Designed to be minimal and efficient, making it ideal for performance-focused users.
  • The XBPS package manager is lightweight yet powerful, providing straightforward package management.

Cons

  • Documentation is less comprehensive compared to more popular distros, which can be challenging for newcomers.
  • Requires manual configuration for many aspects, which may not be suitable for all users.
  • Some users may find package availability limited compared to larger ecosystems.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: EndeavourOS

It eases the transition with a user-friendly installer and familiar desktop options.

📚

Following tutorials

Pick: EndeavourOS

Extensive Arch-based documentation and community support make it easier to find help.

🖥️

Using older hardware

Pick: Void Linux

Its lightweight nature and minimal resource usage are ideal for older machines.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: EndeavourOS

Access to the AUR allows easy installation of gaming tools and drivers.

💼

Work/professional use

Pick: Void Linux

Offers stability and efficiency without unnecessary software clutter.

🖥️

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Either

Both offer efficient and customizable desktops suitable for daily tasks.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

How are EndeavourOS and Void Linux related?

EndeavourOS is based on Arch Linux, offering an easier setup, while Void Linux is entirely independent, with its own package manager and init system.

Which is more beginner-friendly: EndeavourOS or Void Linux?

EndeavourOS is generally more beginner-friendly due to its guided installation process and comprehensive Arch-based resources.

Which offers better performance: EndeavourOS or Void Linux?

Void Linux often provides better performance due to its minimalist approach and runit init system, which is lighter than systemd.

Can I try these distros before installing?

Yes, both offer live environments to test before installation. EndeavourOS provides a live ISO, and Void Linux has a live image available for download.

Are software compatibility issues common with these distros?

EndeavourOS benefits from the vast Arch User Repository, while Void Linux has a more limited selection, which can lead to occasional compatibility issues.

How is hardware support for EndeavourOS and Void Linux?

Both distros offer good hardware support, but EndeavourOS may have an edge due to the extensive Arch Linux kernel and driver support.

What are the release cycles for these distros?

EndeavourOS follows a rolling release model, providing continuous updates, whereas Void Linux updates packages regularly but not as frequently.

Is it easy to switch between EndeavourOS and Void Linux?

Switching between them is feasible but requires backing up data and a fresh installation due to differences in package management and system configuration.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.