Garuda Linux vs Solus

Garuda Linux and Solus offer unique experiences tailored for different users. This page examines their strengths and weaknesses, helping you decide which suits your needs best.

Garuda Linux Icon

Garuda Linux

The Gaming Powerhouse

  • Optimized for performance
  • Beautiful KDE customization
  • BTRFS with snapshots
  • Comprehensive gaming support
  • Higher system requirements
  • Complex initial setup
Best for Gaming enthusiasts
Solus Icon

Solus

Built for Simplicity

  • Independent development
  • Budgie desktop environment
  • Rolling release model
  • Highly curated software center
  • Limited software availability
  • Smaller community
Best for Daily desktop use

TL;DR: Pick Garuda Linux for gaming performance. Pick Solus for a straightforward daily desktop experience.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Linux

Garuda Linux provides a powerful but complex setup, requiring some technical knowledge for initial configuration.

Solus

Solus is designed for simplicity, offering a straightforward installation process and user-friendly interface.

Desktop feel

Linux

Garuda’s KDE environment is highly customizable, offering a visually stunning and responsive experience.

Solus

Solus with Budgie provides a clean, modern desktop environment with an emphasis on simplicity.

Stability

Linux

Garuda’s rolling release model can introduce some instability, but BTRFS snapshots help mitigate risk.

Solus

Solus is generally stable, with a well-tested rolling release model that balances new features with reliability.

Updates

Linux

Garuda provides frequent updates, keeping users on the cutting edge, though this can occasionally lead to instability.

Solus

Solus delivers regular, curated updates, ensuring a balance of new features and stability.

Software access

Linux

Garuda benefits from the extensive Arch User Repository (AUR), offering a vast array of software options.

Solus

Solus has a curated software center that prioritizes quality over quantity, limiting some software choices.

Privacy

Linux

Garuda places a strong emphasis on user privacy, with numerous privacy-focused tools available.

Solus

Solus offers a privacy-respecting environment by default, though it lacks some of the advanced privacy tools found in other distros.

Community & docs

Linux

Garuda has a growing community with active forums, but relies heavily on Arch documentation.

Solus

Solus has a smaller community, which can limit support options, but offers comprehensive official documentation.

Gaming

Linux

Garuda excels in gaming support with pre-installed tools and optimizations for a superior gaming experience.

Solus

Solus supports gaming well, but lacks the extensive pre-installed gaming tools found in Garuda.

Pros & cons summary

Garuda Linux

Pros

  • Garuda Linux is optimized for high performance with out-of-the-box tweaks that enhance speed and responsiveness.
  • The KDE version offers stunning visuals and extensive customization options to tailor the desktop environment.
  • The use of BTRFS as the default file system provides robust data protection with automatic snapshots.
  • Garuda includes tools like GameMode and Proton out of the box, offering excellent support for gaming on Linux.

Cons

  • The system requires more powerful hardware than typical Linux distributions, making it less ideal for older machines.
  • The initial setup can be complex, especially for users unfamiliar with Arch-based systems.

Solus

Pros

  • Solus is independently developed, providing a unique approach to desktop Linux with a focus on simplicity and modernity.
  • The Budgie desktop environment is sleek and modern, offering an aesthetically pleasing and user-friendly interface.
  • Solus follows a rolling release model, ensuring users have access to the latest software updates and features.
  • The software center is highly curated, providing a clean and easy way to install essential software.

Cons

  • Software availability is more limited compared to distributions that use larger repositories like Ubuntu or Arch.
  • The smaller community can mean fewer resources and community support compared to more popular distributions.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Solus

Solus offers a straightforward, user-friendly experience that eases the transition from Windows.

📚

Following tutorials

Pick: Either

Both distros have extensive documentation and community support, making them suitable for learning.

🖥️

Older hardware

Pick: Solus

Solus is generally lighter on resources, making it a better choice for older hardware.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Garuda Linux

Garuda is optimized for gaming with pre-installed tools and tweaks that enhance performance.

💼

Work/professional use

Pick: Solus

Solus provides a stable and distraction-free environment suited for professional tasks.

🧑‍💻

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Solus

Solus offers a clean and simple desktop experience ideal for daily use.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

Are Garuda Linux and Solus related?

No, Garuda Linux is based on Arch, while Solus is independently developed with its own package management system.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

Solus is generally more beginner-friendly due to its straightforward installation and user-friendly interface.

How do they compare in terms of performance?

Garuda is optimized for performance with gaming in mind, while Solus offers solid performance with a focus on simplicity.

Can I try them before installing?

Yes, both Garuda Linux and Solus offer live environments that allow you to test them without installation.

How is software compatibility?

Garuda has extensive software compatibility via the AUR, while Solus offers a curated selection of essential software.

What about hardware support?

Both distros support a wide range of hardware, though Garuda may require more powerful systems for optimal performance.

How often are updates released?

Garuda follows a rolling release model with frequent updates, while Solus provides regular updates that balance new features with stability.

Is it easy to switch between them?

Switching between these distros is straightforward, though users may need to adjust to different package managers and system setups.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.