Manjaro vs Tails

Manjaro and Tails represent two distinct approaches in the Linux world: one offering a user-friendly desktop experience and the other prioritizing utmost privacy. This page explores their strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right one.

Manjaro Icon

Manjaro

The Comfortable Choice

  • User-friendly Arch experience
  • Wide range of desktop environments
  • Robust community support
  • Rolling release model
  • Not as beginner-friendly as Ubuntu
  • Potential instability with rolling updates
Best for Desktop simplicity
Tails Icon

Tails

Privacy First OS

  • Strong focus on privacy
  • Runs from USB without installation
  • Tor network integration
  • Amnesic system
  • Limited software selection
  • Not suited for daily use
Best for Privacy protection

TL;DR: Pick Manjaro for desktop ease. Pick Tails for privacy.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Manjaro

Manjaro is known for making Arch Linux accessible with user-friendly interfaces and pre-installed applications.

Tails

Tails prioritizes privacy over ease of use, potentially requiring more technical knowledge to use effectively.

Desktop feel

Manjaro

Manjaro offers a familiar and customizable desktop experience across multiple environments.

Tails

Tails has a minimalistic interface primarily focused on privacy tasks rather than desktop aesthetics.

Stability

Manjaro

Manjaro's rolling release can occasionally introduce instability, though it generally maintains a stable environment.

Tails

Tails is stable for its intended use case of privacy-centric tasks, with updates focused on security.

Updates

Manjaro

Manjaro uses a rolling release model, providing continuous updates without the need for major upgrades.

Tails

Tails follows a fixed release cycle with updates aimed at maintaining security and privacy.

Software access

Manjaro

Manjaro provides access to a vast array of software through the Arch User Repository and official repositories.

Tails

Tails offers a limited set of pre-installed applications focused on privacy and security.

Privacy

Manjaro

While Manjaro respects user privacy, it does not offer the same level of anonymity as Tails.

Tails

Tails is built for privacy, ensuring all activities are secure and anonymous via the Tor network.

Community & docs

Manjaro

Manjaro benefits from a large community and extensive documentation, making it easier for users to find help.

Tails

Tails has a dedicated community focused on privacy, though its documentation is more specialized.

Gaming

Manjaro

Manjaro is suitable for gaming, supporting Steam and various gaming tools available in its repositories.

Tails

Tails is not designed for gaming, focusing instead on secure and anonymous computing.

Pros & cons summary

Manjaro

Pros

  • Manjaro offers a user-friendly experience built on Arch Linux, providing simplicity through its graphical installer and pre-configured desktop environments.
  • It supports multiple desktop environments including Xfce, KDE, and GNOME, catering to varied user preferences.
  • Manjaro benefits from a strong community, providing extensive documentation and support forums.
  • The rolling release model ensures users always have access to the latest software without needing to upgrade to newer versions regularly.
  • Access to the Arch User Repository (AUR) allows users to install a wide range of software easily.

Cons

  • While more accessible than pure Arch Linux, Manjaro may still present a learning curve for users completely new to Linux.
  • The rolling release model, while keeping software up-to-date, can occasionally introduce instability or compatibility issues.

Tails

Pros

  • Tails is designed with a strong focus on privacy, ensuring that all internet connections are routed through the Tor network.
  • It is a live operating system, meaning it runs directly from a USB stick without needing to be installed on a computer, preserving user anonymity.
  • With Tor integration, users can browse the internet anonymously, protecting against surveillance and censorship.
  • The system is amnesic, meaning it leaves no trace on the computer unless explicitly requested, enhancing privacy further.
  • Tails includes essential tools like the Tor Browser and secure communication applications, making it ideal for users prioritizing privacy.

Cons

  • The focus on privacy means Tails sacrifices a broader software ecosystem, limiting its utility for general computing tasks.
  • It's not designed for everyday use, as it's optimized for specific privacy-related scenarios, making it less practical for general desktop use.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Manjaro

Manjaro provides a user-friendly interface and ease of use ideal for former Windows users.

🔍

Following Linux Tutorials

Pick: Manjaro

Its Arch base allows users to follow a wide range of Linux tutorials and guides effectively.

🖥️

Older Hardware

Pick: Manjaro

With lightweight desktop options, Manjaro can run efficiently on older hardware.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Manjaro

Manjaro supports gaming applications and Steam, making it more suitable for gamers.

💼

Work/Professional Use

Pick: Either

Both offer unique strengths: Manjaro for general productivity, Tails for privacy-intensive tasks.

🖱️

Simple Daily Desktop

Pick: Manjaro

It offers a comprehensive desktop experience with easy access to everyday applications.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

What is the relationship between Manjaro and Tails?

Manjaro and Tails are both Linux distributions but serve different purposes: Manjaro is a general-purpose desktop OS, whereas Tails is designed for privacy.

Which distro is more beginner-friendly?

Manjaro is generally more beginner-friendly due to its user-friendly interfaces and comprehensive documentation.

How do the performance and speed compare?

Manjaro typically offers better performance for general use, while Tails optimizes for security, which can impact speed.

Can I try these distros before installation?

Yes, both Manjaro and Tails can be tried as live sessions, with Tails running directly from USB without installation.

How do they handle software compatibility?

Manjaro supports a wide range of software through its repositories and AUR, while Tails focuses on essential privacy tools.

What about hardware support?

Manjaro offers broad hardware support, while Tails is more limited, ensuring compatibility primarily for privacy tools.

How often are updates released?

Manjaro uses a rolling release model for continuous updates, whereas Tails follows a fixed release cycle with security-focused updates.

Is it easy to switch between Manjaro and Tails?

Switching between these distros requires adjusting to different environments and purposes; Manjaro for general use, Tails for privacy.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.