MX Linux vs Solus

MX Linux and Solus stand out in the Linux world for their unique approaches to user experience. MX Linux is celebrated for its simplicity and community support, while Solus offers a modern, independent approach with its Budgie desktop. This page covers their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability for various use cases.

Mx Linux Icon

MX Linux

The comfortable choice

  • User-friendly with intuitive tools
  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Strong community support
  • Excellent hardware compatibility
  • Less cutting-edge software
  • Limited desktop environment options
Best for Desktop simplicity
Solus Icon

Solus

A modern experience

  • Budgie desktop for modern feel
  • Rolling release model
  • Optimized for performance
  • Independent development
  • Smaller user base
  • Limited software repositories
Best for Modern desktop experience

TL;DR: Pick MX Linux for simplicity and support. Pick Solus for a modern experience and rolling updates.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Linux

MX Linux is designed with ease of use in mind, offering intuitive tools and a user-friendly interface.

Solus

Solus provides a streamlined user experience with its modern Budgie desktop, suitable for users who prefer a contemporary look.

Desktop feel

Linux

Leverages the XFCE desktop for a classic, efficient user experience.

Solus

Offers the Budgie desktop, known for its sleek and modern aesthetic.

Stability

Linux

Prioritizes stability with a Debian base, making it reliable for day-to-day use.

Solus

Rolling release model provides the latest updates, but may introduce occasional stability challenges.

Updates

Linux

Utilizes a stable release cycle, focusing on reliability over cutting-edge updates.

Solus

Employs a rolling release model, providing continuous updates and new features.

Software access

Linux

Offers access to a wide range of software through the Debian repositories.

Solus

Has a curated set of software repositories, with a focus on quality over quantity.

Privacy

Linux

MX Linux provides a strong focus on user privacy, with minimal telemetry.

Solus

Solus emphasizes privacy, with built-in features that respect user data.

Community & docs

Linux

Strong community support and extensive documentation aid troubleshooting and learning.

Solus

Smaller community but active forums and documentation provide user support.

Gaming

Linux

Supports gaming through compatibility with Steam and Proton, but less optimized than Solus.

Solus

Optimized for gaming with performance tweaks and support for gaming platforms.

Pros & cons summary

MX Linux

Pros

  • MX Linux is known for its user-friendly approach, providing intuitive tools like MX Tools that simplify system management tasks.
  • The distribution is lightweight, making it suitable for older hardware and ensuring efficient performance.
  • It benefits from a strong community and extensive documentation, offering user support and resources for troubleshooting.
  • MX Linux boasts excellent hardware compatibility out of the box, reducing setup time and effort for users.

Cons

  • The distribution tends to offer more stable but less cutting-edge software, which may not appeal to users seeking the latest features.
  • It primarily offers the XFCE desktop environment, limiting customization options for users preferring other environments.
  • The focus on stability over innovation can lead to slower adoption of new technologies and features.

Solus

Pros

  • Solus features the Budgie desktop environment, offering a sleek and modern user interface that is both visually appealing and functional.
  • It follows a rolling release model, ensuring users have access to the latest software updates and features without needing to reinstall the OS.
  • Solus is optimized for performance, providing a smooth and responsive experience even on less powerful hardware.
  • As an independently developed distro, Solus is not based on any other Linux distribution, allowing for unique design choices and innovations.

Cons

  • Solus has a smaller user base compared to larger distributions, potentially limiting community support and resources.
  • The software repositories are not as extensive as those of larger distros, which may impact availability of certain applications.
  • Being an independent distribution, Solus may face challenges in terms of long-term sustainability and development resources.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Either

Both offer a user-friendly experience for newcomers transitioning from Windows.

📚

Following tutorials

Pick: MX Linux

Its Debian base and strong community make it easier to find resources and tutorials.

🖥️

Older hardware

Pick: MX Linux

Its lightweight nature makes it ideal for extending the life of older machines.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Solus

Optimized for gaming with support for the latest drivers and platforms.

💼

Work/professional use

Pick: MX Linux

Its stability and extensive application support make it suitable for professional environments.

🏠

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Either

Both distros provide a simple and effective desktop environment for everyday tasks.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

Are MX Linux and Solus related?

No, MX Linux is based on Debian, while Solus is an independent distribution. They have different development goals and base systems.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

MX Linux is generally considered more beginner-friendly due to its strong community support and user-friendly tools.

How do they perform in terms of speed?

Both distros are optimized for speed, but Solus is particularly noted for its performance optimizations with the Budgie desktop.

Can I try them before installing?

Yes, both MX Linux and Solus offer live environments that allow you to test them without installing on your hard drive.

How is software compatibility?

MX Linux has broader software compatibility due to its Debian base, while Solus offers a curated selection focusing on quality.

What about hardware support?

MX Linux is known for excellent hardware compatibility out of the box, while Solus works well with modern hardware but has fewer pre-included drivers.

How are the release cycles different?

MX Linux follows a stable release cycle with periodic updates, whereas Solus uses a rolling release model for continuous updates.

Is it easy to switch between them?

Switching between the two involves learning different system bases and package managers, but both offer sufficient documentation to assist in the transition.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.