MX Linux
The comfortable choice
- User-friendly interface
- Strong community support
- Efficient performance
- Minimal hardware requirements
- Limited rolling release model
- Less customization flexibility
MX Linux and Void Linux both offer unique approaches to Linux use. This page breaks down their differences, strengths, and ideal user scenarios to guide you in choosing the right distro.
The comfortable choice
Ultimate flexibility
TL;DR: Pick MX Linux for ease of use and support. Pick Void Linux for customization and a rolling release model.
How they stack up across key categories.
MX Linux is known for its user-friendly interface, making it a great choice for beginners.
Void Linux requires more knowledge to set up, presenting a steeper learning curve for new users.
Offers a polished and cohesive desktop experience with XFCE as the default environment.
Highly customizable, allowing users to choose their preferred desktop environment with minimal defaults.
Stable release model ensures reliability with well-tested updates.
Rolling release provides up-to-date software but requires careful management to maintain stability.
Provides regular updates with a balance between new features and stability.
Features a true rolling release with continuous software updates.
Offers access to a wide range of software through its repositories and the use of third-party tools like Flatpak.
Uses XBPS for package management, which is efficient but has a smaller repository compared to some other distros.
Focuses on user privacy with minimal data collection and strong security practices.
Void Linux's minimalistic approach inherently provides a high level of privacy and control over the system.
Has a large, active community with extensive documentation and forums available.
Smaller community but offers well-written documentation and a helpful IRC channel.
Supports gaming with good compatibility for Steam and Proton.
Capable of gaming but may require more setup and configuration to get everything working smoothly.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: MX Linux
It's user-friendly and similar in ease of use to Windows.
Pick: Either
Both distros have sufficient documentation and community support for learning.
Pick: MX Linux
It is optimized for performance on older machines.
Pick: MX Linux
Provides better out-of-the-box support for gaming platforms.
Pick: Void Linux
Its rolling release provides the latest software, beneficial for certain professional environments.
Pick: MX Linux
Offers a stable and easy-to-use environment for daily tasks.
Quick answers to common questions.
There is no direct relationship; they are separate projects with different goals and communities.
MX Linux is more beginner-friendly due to its user-friendly interface and extensive community support.
Void Linux may offer better performance due to its minimalistic design, but both are efficient on a variety of hardware.
Yes, both MX Linux and Void Linux offer live environments that let you test them before installation.
MX Linux uses APT for package management, while Void Linux uses XBPS. Both offer extensive software libraries but differ in package availability.
MX Linux generally has better support for a wide range of hardware, while Void Linux may require more manual configuration.
MX Linux follows a semi-rolling release model, while Void Linux is a true rolling release distribution.
Switching requires a fresh installation and reconfiguration, but both have documentation to assist the process.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.