Pop!_OS vs Rocky Linux

Pop!_OS and Rocky Linux are two distinct Linux distributions catering to different user needs. Pop!_OS excels in desktop usability and gaming, while Rocky Linux focuses on enterprise stability and long-term support. This comparison covers their key features, pros, cons, and best use cases.

Pop Os Icon

Pop!_OS

The Comfortable Choice

  • User-friendly interface
  • Optimized for gaming
  • Great hardware support
  • Regular updates
  • Limited enterprise features
  • Not as stable as LTS distros
Best for Desktop simplicity
Rocky Linux Icon

Rocky Linux

Community-Driven Stability

  • Enterprise-ready
  • Great stability
  • Long-term support
  • RHEL compatibility
  • Not focused on desktop use
  • Slower update cycle
Best for Enterprise environments

TL;DR: Pick Pop!_OS for desktop and gaming. Pick Rocky Linux for enterprise stability.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS offers an intuitive user experience with its customized GNOME desktop, ideal for newcomers.

Linux

Rocky Linux requires more technical expertise, focusing on enterprise and server environments.

Desktop feel

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS provides a modern and polished desktop with tiling features for enhanced productivity.

Linux

Rocky Linux is not optimized for desktop use, adhering to a more traditional and minimal server setup.

Stability

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS receives frequent updates, offering new features but sometimes at the cost of stability.

Linux

Rocky Linux prioritizes stability with its long-term support model, ideal for critical systems.

Updates

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS follows a rolling release model, providing regular improvements and new features.

Linux

Rocky Linux follows a slower, stable update cycle aligned with RHEL, ensuring reliability.

Software access

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS offers easy access to a variety of software via its Pop!_Shop and APT package manager.

Linux

Rocky Linux supports enterprise-grade applications with YUM/DNF package management, mirroring RHEL repositories.

Privacy

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS respects user privacy with minimal telemetry and strong security features.

Linux

Rocky Linux also emphasizes privacy, especially in enterprise environments, adhering to open-source principles.

Community & docs

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS benefits from a supportive community and comprehensive documentation from System76.

Linux

Rocky Linux has a growing community, with strong documentation and support for enterprise users.

Gaming

Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS is optimized for gaming with tailored drivers and performance tweaks.

Linux

Rocky Linux is not focused on gaming, aligning more with server and enterprise use cases.

Pros & cons summary

Pop!_OS

Pros

  • Pop!_OS features a clean and intuitive GNOME-based desktop environment that is customized for ease of use.
  • System76's focus on gaming ensures optimized performance for gaming enthusiasts.
  • Excellent out-of-the-box hardware support, especially for System76 devices.
  • Frequent updates keep the system secure and feature-rich.
  • Integrated features for tiling windows enhance productivity.

Cons

  • Pop!_OS lacks some of the enterprise-grade features found in server-focused distributions.
  • Rolling updates can occasionally introduce instability, compared to LTS distributions.
  • The GNOME environment might be resource-heavy for very old hardware.

Rocky Linux

Pros

  • Rocky Linux is a community-driven enterprise operating system designed for stability.
  • It aims to be 100% bug-for-bug compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
  • Perfect for servers and enterprise-grade applications thanks to its robust security and support.
  • Long-term support provides a reliable platform for critical applications.
  • The community-driven approach ensures open-source principles are upheld.

Cons

  • Rocky Linux is not optimized for desktop use, focusing instead on servers and enterprise applications.
  • The slower update cycle prioritizes stability over having the latest features.
  • Limited gaming support compared to desktop-centric distributions.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS offers a user-friendly interface similar to Windows, easing the transition.

📚

Following Linux Tutorials

Pick: Either

Both distributions have strong communities and documentation to support learning.

🖥️

Using Older Hardware

Pick: Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS is more adaptable for older hardware with its lightweight modes and GNOME optimizations.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS is optimized for gaming with dedicated drivers and gaming performance enhancements.

🏢

Work/Professional Use

Pick: Rocky Linux

Rocky Linux offers stability and security, ideal for professional environments.

🖱️

Simple Daily Desktop

Pick: Pop!_OS

Pop!_OS provides a simple and efficient desktop experience for everyday tasks.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

How are Pop!_OS and Rocky Linux related?

Pop!_OS is based on Ubuntu, focusing on desktop use and gaming, while Rocky Linux is a RHEL clone for enterprise environments.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

Pop!_OS is more beginner-friendly with its user-focused design and intuitive interface, suitable for new Linux users.

How do they compare in terms of performance and speed?

Pop!_OS is optimized for desktop performance and gaming, while Rocky Linux focuses on stable performance for servers.

Can I try these distros before installing?

Yes, both Pop!_OS and Rocky Linux offer live environments to test the system before installation.

What about software compatibility?

Pop!_OS includes a wide range of software via APT, while Rocky Linux offers enterprise software through YUM/DNF.

How do they support various hardware?

Pop!_OS supports a broad range of hardware, especially System76 devices, while Rocky Linux targets server-grade hardware.

What is the release cycle for each distro?

Pop!_OS follows a rolling release model for frequent updates, while Rocky Linux aligns with RHEL's long-term support cycle.

Is it easy to switch between these distros?

Switching requires a fresh install due to different base systems, but both offer strong documentation to assist with migration.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.