Solus and Zorin OS are both user-friendly Linux distributions, each with their own strengths. Solus shines with its independent nature and rolling release model, while Zorin OS offers a familiar environment for Windows switchers. This comparison will help you decide which to choose based on your personal or professional needs.
Built for home computing
Your gateway to Linux
TL;DR: Pick Solus for a simple, rolling-release desktop. Pick Zorin OS if you're transitioning from Windows.
How they stack up across key categories.
Solus offers a clean and straightforward user interface, making it easy for newcomers to navigate and manage their system.
Zorin OS provides a familiar layout for Windows users, easing the transition with a friendly and intuitive design.
The Budgie desktop in Solus is modern and visually appealing, focusing on simplicity and usability.
Zorin OS's desktop can mimic Windows or macOS layouts, providing a customizable experience that feels familiar to new users.
Solus's rolling release model ensures up-to-date applications while maintaining stability through rigorous testing.
Being based on Ubuntu LTS, Zorin OS offers a stable and reliable platform with a predictable release cycle.
Solus uses a rolling release approach, meaning users receive continuous updates without needing full system upgrades.
Zorin OS follows the Ubuntu release cycle, offering regular updates with long-term support versions for extended maintenance.
Solus has its own curated repository, which provides essential applications but may lack some niche software.
Zorin OS benefits from Ubuntu's extensive repositories, giving access to a wide range of applications and tools.
Solus does not include telemetry by default, prioritizing user privacy and security.
Zorin OS, like Ubuntu, has been improving privacy settings, giving users more control over data sharing.
Solus's community is smaller but active, and it offers comprehensive documentation for users.
Zorin OS, supported by the larger Ubuntu community, has extensive resources and a supportive user base.
Solus supports gaming with Steam and Lutris, running native and some Windows games efficiently.
Zorin OS provides built-in support for Steam and Wine, making it easy to set up and play games.
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Pick: Zorin OS
It offers a familiar interface and tools to run Windows applications.
Pick: Either
Both distros have sufficient documentation and community support for learning.
Pick: Zorin OS
The Lite version is optimized for older or low-spec machines.
Pick: Solus
It offers a rolling release with up-to-date gaming libraries and drivers.
Pick: Zorin OS
Its LTS base provides stability and long-term support for professional environments.
Pick: Solus
Its clean, uncluttered interface is perfect for daily tasks and simplicity.
Quick answers to common questions.
No, Solus is an independent distribution while Zorin OS is based on Ubuntu. They have different development goals and bases.
Zorin OS is generally considered more beginner-friendly due to its Windows-like interface and tools for running Windows applications.
Both distros are optimized for performance, but Solus may have a slight edge due to its streamlined system and rolling updates.
Yes, both Solus and Zorin OS offer live USB options, allowing you to try them without installing on your hard drive.
Most Linux-compatible software will work on both, but Zorin OS may have better support for Windows applications due to Wine and PlayOnLinux.
Zorin OS, based on Ubuntu, generally has excellent hardware support. Solus also supports a wide range of hardware but may require additional configuration for some devices.
Solus uses a rolling release model, providing continuous updates, while Zorin OS follows the Ubuntu LTS cycle with stable, periodic releases.
Switching requires a fresh installation, but both distros offer straightforward installation processes and can coexist on a dual-boot setup.
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.
