Ubuntu MATE
The comfortable choice
- User-friendly interface
- Lightweight and fast
- Great for older hardware
- Strong community support
- Less customization than some DEs
- Fewer enterprise tools
Best for
Desktop simplicity
Ubuntu MATE vs Ubuntu Server
Ubuntu MATE and Ubuntu Server are two distinct flavors of the popular Ubuntu distribution, each tailored for specific use cases. This comparison helps you understand their differences, strengths, and ideal scenarios to aid in your decision-making process.
Ubuntu Server
Reliable server solution
- Optimized for server use
- Robust security features
- Wide range of server applications
- Long-term support (LTS) editions
- No graphical interface by default
- Steeper learning curve for newcomers
Best for
Server environments
TL;DR: Pick Ubuntu MATE for an easy-to-use desktop experience. Choose Ubuntu Server for a robust, secure server environment.
Side-by-side comparison
How they stack up across key categories.
Ease of use
MATE
Ubuntu MATE offers a familiar desktop experience that's easy to use, even for Linux newcomers.
Server
Ubuntu Server requires command-line knowledge, making it less accessible for beginners.
Desktop feel
MATE
MATE provides a traditional desktop layout that's customizable and efficient.
Server
No desktop environment is included by default, as it's designed for server tasks.
Stability
MATE
Regular updates ensure stability without sacrificing performance.
Server
Offers long-term support releases, ensuring stability for critical deployments.
Updates
MATE
Provides regular updates and a stable release cycle, similar to other Ubuntu flavors.
Server
Focuses on security and stability updates, particularly important for servers.
Software access
MATE
Access to a wide range of applications through the Ubuntu Software Center.
Server
Extensive repository of server applications and tools via APT.
Privacy
MATE
Offers standard Ubuntu privacy settings and respects user data.
Server
Emphasizes security, a crucial aspect for server privacy.
Community & docs
MATE
Strong community and ample documentation make problem-solving straightforward.
Server
Supported by Canonical and a dedicated server community, with extensive documentation available.
Gaming
MATE
Not optimized for gaming, but can handle basic games.
Server
Not suitable for gaming as it lacks graphical capabilities out of the box.
Pros & cons summary
Ubuntu MATE
Pros
- Ubuntu MATE uses the MATE desktop environment, which is intuitive and easy to navigate, especially for users familiar with traditional desktop layouts.
- The distribution is lightweight and optimized, making it suitable for older hardware and systems with limited resources.
- It comes pre-installed with a selection of essential applications, reducing setup time for daily tasks.
- Strong community support and active forums help users troubleshoot and customize their experience.
- Regular updates ensure security while maintaining stability.
Cons
- The MATE desktop environment offers fewer customization options compared to more modern interfaces like GNOME or KDE Plasma.
- Ubuntu MATE lacks some enterprise-grade tools and support, which might be a consideration for business environments.
- Some users might find the traditional desktop paradigm less appealing compared to more modern UX designs.
Ubuntu Server
Pros
- Ubuntu Server is tailored for server use with packages optimized for performance and reliability.
- Security is a priority, with features like AppArmor and automatic updates to protect against vulnerabilities.
- A wide range of server applications are available via the APT package manager, covering web servers, databases, and more.
- Long-term support (LTS) editions offer stability and security updates for five years, ideal for critical deployments.
- Strong support from Canonical and an active community provide additional resources and support.
Cons
- Ubuntu Server does not include a graphical user interface by default, making it less approachable for users without command-line experience.
- The focus on server tasks means it might not be suitable for desktop use without additional setup.
- New users might find the setup and configuration process more complex compared to desktop-oriented distributions.
Which should you pick?
Quick recommendations for common scenarios.
Switching from Windows
Pick: Ubuntu MATE
Offers a familiar desktop environment that eases the transition.
Following Linux tutorials
Pick: Either
Both distros are well-documented and supported.
Running on older hardware
Pick: Ubuntu MATE
Lightweight and efficient, perfect for older systems.
Gaming setup
Pick: Ubuntu MATE
More suitable for gaming, though not optimized for it.
Work/professional use
Pick: Ubuntu Server
Ideal for server tasks and enterprise environments.
Simple daily desktop
Pick: Ubuntu MATE
Provides an easy-to-use environment for daily tasks.
FAQ
Quick answers to common questions.
What is the relationship between Ubuntu MATE and Ubuntu Server?
Both are official Ubuntu derivatives, sharing the same core system but optimized for different use cases: MATE for desktops and Server for server environments.
Is Ubuntu MATE or Ubuntu Server more beginner-friendly?
Ubuntu MATE is more beginner-friendly due to its graphical interface, while Ubuntu Server requires command-line skills.
How do the performance and speed compare?
Ubuntu MATE is optimized for desktop use and is lightweight, while Ubuntu Server focuses on server performance and efficiency.
Can I try these distros before installing?
Yes, Ubuntu MATE can be tried as a live session, while Ubuntu Server can be tested in a virtual machine environment.
Are software compatibility and hardware support different?
Both distros support a wide range of software and hardware, but Ubuntu MATE is oriented towards desktop apps, while Server focuses on server applications.
What are the release cycles like?
Both follow Ubuntu's release cycle, with LTS versions every two years and interim releases every six months.
How easy is it to switch between these distros?
Switching requires installation changes, especially since Server lacks a desktop by default, but both use the same core system.
Which is better for enterprise environments?
Ubuntu Server is better suited for enterprise environments due to its focus on security and server capabilities.
Compare another pair?
Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.