Ubuntu vs Void Linux

Ubuntu and Void Linux represent two distinct approaches to Linux distributions. This page explores their differences in terms of user experience, customization, and community support to help you decide which one is the best fit for your needs.

Ubuntu Icon

Ubuntu

The comfortable choice

  • Wide community support
  • User-friendly interface
  • Robust software repositories
  • Frequent updates and security patches
  • Can be resource-heavy
  • Less control over system configuration
Best for Desktop simplicity
Void Linux Icon

Void Linux

Minimalist and flexible

  • Lightweight and efficient
  • High degree of customization
  • Unique init system (runit)
  • Rolling release model
  • Steep learning curve
  • Smaller community support
Best for Custom setups

TL;DR: Pick Ubuntu for ease of use and community support. Pick Void Linux for customization and lightweight performance.

Side-by-side comparison

How they stack up across key categories.

Ease of use

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is known for its user-friendly interface, making it ideal for those new to Linux.

Linux

Void Linux, while powerful, is less intuitive and has a steeper learning curve, suitable for advanced users.

Desktop feel

Ubuntu

Ubuntu uses the GNOME desktop environment by default, offering a polished and modern look.

Linux

Void Linux allows for various desktop environments, providing flexibility but requiring more setup.

Stability

Ubuntu

Ubuntu's LTS versions are stable and reliable, with security patches and updates provided regularly.

Linux

Void Linux's rolling release model can impact stability but ensures the latest software is available.

Updates

Ubuntu

Frequent updates with both LTS and interim releases provide balance between stability and new features.

Linux

Void Linux offers continuous updates via its rolling release, ideal for users who want the latest software.

Software access

Ubuntu

Ubuntu has extensive software repositories and the Snap Store for easy installation.

Linux

Void Linux uses XBPS, offering a wide range of packages but requires more manual setup.

Privacy

Ubuntu

Ubuntu has faced criticism for privacy issues, though recent versions have improved.

Linux

Void Linux, with its minimalist approach, offers a more privacy-conscious setup by default.

Community & docs

Ubuntu

Ubuntu benefits from a vast and active community with extensive documentation and forums.

Linux

Void Linux has a smaller community, making finding help more challenging.

Gaming

Ubuntu

Ubuntu supports gaming well with Steam and Proton compatibility.

Linux

Void Linux can handle gaming but may require more manual configuration for optimal performance.

Pros & cons summary

Ubuntu

Pros

  • Ubuntu has a large and active community, making it easier to find help and resources.
  • The user interface is intuitive, making it ideal for beginners.
  • It provides access to a vast array of software through its repositories and the Snap Store.
  • Regular updates ensure security and access to new features, with both LTS and interim releases available.
  • Compatible with a wide range of hardware, from desktops to laptops.

Cons

  • Ubuntu's default GNOME desktop can be resource-intensive, impacting performance on older hardware.
  • Opting for simplicity, Ubuntu offers less flexibility in system customization compared to other distros like Void Linux.
  • The inclusion of some proprietary software by default may not appeal to users seeking a strictly open-source environment.

Void Linux

Pros

  • Void Linux is designed to be lightweight, using runit as its init system for faster boot times and lower resource usage.
  • The system allows for extensive customization, appealing to advanced users who want to tailor their environment.
  • Its rolling release model keeps your system up-to-date with the latest software.
  • Void Linux uses the XBPS package manager, which is both fast and flexible.
  • The distro supports multiple architectures, including ARM and PowerPC.

Cons

  • Void Linux requires more technical knowledge to install and configure, making it less suitable for beginners.
  • With a smaller community, finding support and documentation can be challenging compared to Ubuntu.
  • The rolling release model, while advantageous for updates, can sometimes introduce stability issues.

Which should you pick?

Quick recommendations for common scenarios.

💻

Switching from Windows

Pick: Ubuntu

Ubuntu offers a familiar interface and strong community support, easing the transition.

🛠️

Following tutorials

Pick: Either

Both distros support various environments, but Ubuntu's community provides more tutorials.

🖥️

Older hardware

Pick: Void Linux

Void Linux's lightweight nature makes it ideal for older systems with limited resources.

🎮

Gaming

Pick: Ubuntu

Ubuntu's compatibility with Steam and Proton makes it better suited for gaming.

💼

Work/professional use

Pick: Ubuntu

Ubuntu's stability and software availability make it a reliable choice for professional environments.

🖱️

Simple daily desktop

Pick: Ubuntu

Ubuntu's intuitive interface and easy access to software make it ideal for daily tasks.

FAQ

Quick answers to common questions.

Are Ubuntu and Void Linux related?

No, Ubuntu is based on Debian, while Void Linux is an independent distribution developed from scratch.

Which is more beginner-friendly?

Ubuntu is more beginner-friendly with its user-friendly interface and extensive community support.

Which offers better performance?

Void Linux is generally more lightweight and can offer better performance, especially on older hardware.

Can I try them before installing?

Yes, both Ubuntu and Void Linux offer live environments that you can boot from a USB drive to try before installing.

How does software compatibility compare?

Ubuntu's extensive repositories provide excellent software compatibility. Void Linux also supports a wide range of software but may require more manual installation.

What about hardware support?

Ubuntu offers broad hardware support due to its widespread use. Void Linux supports a range of architectures but may need manual configuration.

How do their release cycles differ?

Ubuntu offers fixed release cycles with LTS and interim versions. Void Linux uses a rolling release model, providing continuous updates.

Is it easy to switch between them?

Switching between Ubuntu and Void Linux requires a fresh installation, as they use different package managers and system architectures.

Compare another pair?

Generate a clean "vs" page for any two distros.